In this regard, we note that amphotericin B is a powerful activator of macrophages 31 and that C. Hence, the effects we observe could be the aggregate of several influences in the system. Nevertheless, there is a clear suggestion of a historical effect on which pH distribution a macrophage will employ. This may also suggest an adaptive component to the macrophage bet-hedging strategy.
All ordinal patterns appear at a non-zero frequency. B pH distributions of phagolysosomes at various HPI. Differently polarized macrophages acidify stochastically but not using this bet-hedging system. To probe whether M0 and M2 polarized macrophages acidify with the same dynamics of M1 macrophages, we repeated these experiments with macrophages that were either not stimulated, or stimulated with IL-4 to skew toward M2.
First, we found that regardless of the polarization skew, all macrophages acidified stochastically Figure 7A. Second, we found that the phagolysosomal pH distributions differed overall, with M2 macrophages having the highest mean pH, followed by M0- and then by M1-skewed macrophages Figure 7B.
Most striking was the observation that M0- and M2-skewed macrophages did not manifest a normally distributed pH range as observed with M1-skewed macrophages. Instead, M0 macrophages consistently yield a bimodal distribution even after 1 hour. The phagosomal pH distribution of M2 macrophages started with a heavy tail of higher pH and eventually stabilized to a bimodal distribution Supplemental Figure 9.
These data suggest that while the macrophages have the same underlying acidification dynamics, they do not share the betting strategy of M1-skewed macrophages. Thus, we estimated the likelihood of each population of macrophages to survive when faced with the same list of human pathogens modeled after bimodal distributions estimated from the observed data Supplemental Figure After comparing these simulations, we found that M1 macrophages by far have the highest mean log fitness, followed by M0, then by M2 Figure 7C.
Our model shows M1 macrophages as resistant to these infectious agents, whereas M2 macrophages are permissive. Phagolysosome dynamics of macrophages skewed toward different polarization states. A Ordinal patterns of bead-containing phagolysosomes at various HPI. B Bead-containing phagolysosome pH distributions of differently polarized macrophages.
Each group represents measurements from all time points 1—4 HPI of each polarization. C Mean log fitness of bead-containing phagolysosomes according to our bet-hedging model. Human monocytes acidify stochastically and approximate normality. To determine how closely the murine system resembled human acidification dynamics, we isolated macrophages from human peripheral blood monocytes and repeated these experiments with beads and live C.
We found that acidification intervals in human cells were also stochastic in nature Figure 8A. Additionally, human cells that ingested inert beads were normally distributed at the minute and 1-hour time intervals. Even though the times skewed away from normality, the skew was not as severe as that observed in yeast-containing phagolysosomes Figure 8, B and C.
We hypothesize that some of this skewing could result from different dynamics due to the different background inherent to human donors, which differ from the mouse system in which cells are isolated from genetically identical individuals Supplemental Figure Furthermore, within the context of our simulation, if we model the phagolysosome pH values of a population of human macrophages as a normal distribution with mean and standard deviation determined from pH values observed across all time points 5.
Human monocyte—derived macrophages acidify stochastically and approximate normality. Human macrophages were infected with inert beads or live C. A Ordinal pattern analysis for all conditions. All patterns exist at non-zero frequencies for all time points.
B Distributions of phagolysosome pH at different time points. C Shapiro-Wilk normality and total sample count for each condition. Pathogens skew phagolysosome acidification toward conditions less favorable to the macrophage. Cryptococcal cells buffer the phagolysosome pH toward 5. We therefore hypothesized that C. We found that phagolysosomes containing live C.
To probe host fitness with regard to C. Here we analyzed the combined data for all time intervals, reasoning that in actual infection interactions between C. Our actual data were not normally distributed with non-bead samples though, as C. The starkest difference we observed is that, in reality, killed and live C. This finding is corroborated by the high proportion of inhibitory phagolysosomes in Cap containing phagolysosomes, a strain incapable of modulating pH since it has no capsule Figure 9C.
Additionally, the expected and observed increased likelihood of bead-containing phagolysosomes to inhibit C. Expected and observed likelihood of phagolysosomes to achieve pH of 4 or less. A The expected proportions of murine BMDM phagolysosomes to achieve pH equal to or less than 4 assuming a normal distribution based on all observed data. B The expected proportions of human macrophage phagolysosomes to achieve pH equal to or less than 4 assuming a normal distribution based on the observed data.
Expected proportions of macrophages to achieve pH equal to or less than 4 were calculated by assuming a normal distribution centered around a mean and standard deviation calculated from the observed data. D The observed proportions of human macrophage phagolysosomes to achieve pH equal to or less than 4.
To probe whether this phenomenon was applicable to pathogens other than C. We found that like C. In contrast, the estimated mean log fitness for the host macrophage population increased when they ingested killed mycobacteria, which are unable to modulate pH Supplemental Figure The complexity and sequential nature of the phagolysosomal maturation process combined with the potential for variability at each of the maturation steps, and the noisy nature of the signaling networks that regulate this process, have led to the proposal that each phagolysosome is a unique and individual unit In fact, the action of kinesin and dynein motors that move phagosomes along microtubules exhibits stochastic behavior, adding another source of randomness to the process Hence, even when the ingested particle is a latex bead taken through one specific type of phagocytic receptor, there is considerable heterogeneity in phagolysosome composition, even within a single cell Since the phagolysosome is a killing machine used to control ingested microbes, this heterogeneity implies there will be differences in the microbicidal efficacy of individual phagolysosomes.
This variability raises fundamental questions about the nature of the dynamical system embodied in the process of phagosomal maturation. In this study, we analyzed the dynamics of phagolysosome pH variability after synchronized ingestion of live yeast cells, dead yeast cells, and latex particles. We sought to characterize the acidification dynamics as either stochastic, an inherently unpredictable process with identical starting conditions yielding different trajectories in time, or deterministic, a theoretically predictable process with identical starting conditions leading to identical trajectories.
In particular, we focused our analysis on differentiating stochastic versus chaotic signatures in the trajectories of phagolysosomal pH. While both dynamics might yield highly divergent trajectories for similar starting conditions i. A chaotic system is defined as one so sensitive to initial conditions that, in practice, initial conditions cannot be replicated precisely enough to see these same trajectories followed.
The dynamical signatures of such systems are unique and can be differentiated from that of other deterministic or stochastic dynamics. Irrespective of the nature of the ingested particle, we observed that the distribution of the increment of phagolysosomal pH reduction was random, indicative of a stochastic process.
We found no evidence that phagosome acidification was a chaotic process. Systems in which a large number of variables each contribute to an outcome tend to exhibit noise, which gives them the characteristics of a stochastic dynamical system. Additionally, while particle size and shape affect ingestion time 38 the mean times to ingestion for beads and C. Since phagocytosis was synchronized and our observations were made over a period of hours, it is unlikely that the effects described here are due to noise from differences in uptake time differences.
In this regard, our finding that phagolysosomal pH demonstrates stochastic features is consistent with our current understanding of the mechanisms involved. Specifically, this stochastic normal distribution was generated at the phagolysosomal level, as evidenced by the fact that different phagosomes within the same macrophage manifested different pH values.
Hence, each macrophage contains phagolysosomes with a different pH rather than each macrophage containing multiple of the same pH, such that the normal distribution observed was generated at the organelle level. The most normally distributed pH sets were those resulting from the ingestion of latex beads, particles that cannot modify the acidity of the phagolysosome.
We note that for the 3 C. Although the cause of this variation is not understood and the strain sample size is too small to draw firm conclusions, we note that such variation could reflect more microbial-mediated modification of the phagolysosomal pH by the C.
In this regard, the capsular polysaccharide of the C. We attempted to separate the dynamics of phagolysosomal maturation from acidification by investigating the accumulation of phagolysosomal maturation markers EEA1 and V-ATPase after ingestion. Analyzing the same time intervals where pH populations stabilized, namely 1 to 4 hours after ingestion, we found no forbidden ordinal patterns, suggesting that phagosome maturation was also a stochastic process.
However, the acquisition of these 2 maturation markers did not approximate a normal distribution at any of the 4 time intervals, with all samples manifesting heavy right skewing. This is especially interesting considering V-ATPase is responsible for pumping protons into the phagolysosome and maintaining acidity. If the number of V-ATPase molecules translated directly to the number of protons pumped into the phagolysosome we would expect correlation between V-ATPase staining intensity and pH, and thus expect normal distributions in both.
The different dynamics observed with V-ATPase immunofluorescence implies that the pH heterogeneity is regulated by additional mechanisms. For example, it is possible that the efficacy of the V-ATPase pumps on the phagolysosomal membrane differs from pump to pump and that these differences also contribute to the distribution of phagolysosomal pHs observed.
For most microbes, maintenance of an acidic environment in the phagolysosome is critically determined on the integrity of the phagolysosomal membrane, keeping protons in the phagolysosomal lumen while excluding more alkaline cytoplasmic contents. For example, with C. For C. However, for C. Adding to the complexity of the C. Treating macrophages with chloroquine, which increases phagosomal pH 42 , potentiates macrophage antifungal activity against C.
Hence, phagosomal acidification does not inhibit C. In the cryptococcal-containing phagolysosome the luminal pH is also likely to reflect a variety of microbial-mediated variables which include ammonia generation from urease, capsular composition, and the integrity of the phagolysosomal membrane.
Analysis of the normality of phagolysosomal pH distributions as a function of time by the Shapiro-Wilk test produced additional insights into the dynamics of these systems. Phagolysosomes containing inert beads manifested pH distributions that met criteria for normality at most time intervals after 1 hour post infection HPI.
We hypothesize that at 0. Additionally, it has been shown that phagolysosomes of macrophages undergo active alkalization, regulated in part by NOX2 activity 45 — It is likely that these early time points veer away from normality due to a combination of phagolysosomes maturing at a different rate and a subpopulation of phagolysosomes that are actively alkalized, both contributing noise to early phagolysosomal dynamics.
In contrast, the pH distribution of phagolysosomes containing dead C. One interpretation of this result is that the process of phagocytosis is itself a randomizing system with Gaussian noise resulting from phagolysosome formation and kinetics of the initial acid-base reactions between increasing proton flux and quenching glucuronic acids in the capsular polysaccharide.
With time, the titration is completed as all glucuronic acid residues are protonated. Dead cells did not synthesize additional polysaccharide, which moved the phagolysosomal pH distribution toward normality. Convergence to or away from normality could reflect a myriad of such variables affecting phagolysosomal pH, including the intensity of acidification, the volume of the phagolysosome largely determined by the yeast capsule radius , the glucuronic acid composition of the capsule, the production of ammonia by urease, and the leakiness of the phagolysosome to cytoplasmic contents with higher pH.
Although our experiments cannot sort out the individual contributions of these factors, they suggest that, in combination, they produce Gaussian noise effects that push or pull the resulting distribution to or from normality. Additionally, human phagolysosome acidification dynamics resembled those of mouse cells but noted significant differences in the distributions of phagolysosomal pH between individual human donors.
This donor-to-donor variation could reflect differences in polymorphisms in Fc receptor genes or other genetic variables and is an interesting subject for future studies. When a phagocytic cell ingests a microbe, it has no information as to the pH range tolerated by the internalized microbe.
A stochastic dynamical process for phagolysosomal acidification could provide phagocytic immune cells and their hosts with the best chance for controlling ingested microbes. The acidic pH in the phagolysosome activates microbicidal mechanisms and acidity is not generally considered a major antimicrobial mechanism in itself. However, our analysis of pH tolerances of 27 pathogenic microbes revealed that the majority are inhibited by phagolysosomal pH with the caveat that some, like C. On the other hand, a less acidic phagosomal pH is conducive to intracellular survival for M.
During an infectious process when the immune system confronts numerous microbial cells, the random nature of the final phagosomal pH will result in some fraction of the infecting inoculum being controlled and possibly killed by initial ingestion, allowing antigen presentation.
In this regard, the mean number of bacteria in the phagolysosomes and cytoplasm of macrophages infected with the intracellular pathogen Francisella tularensis exhibits stochastic dynamics 50 , which in turn could result from the type of stochastic processes in phagolysosome formation noted here. Hence, chance in phagolysosomal pH acidification provides phagocytic cells with a mechanism to hedge their bets such that the stochastic nature of the process is itself a host defense mechanism.
In biology, bet-hedging was described by Darwin as a strategy to overcome an unpredictable environment 51 , which is now known as diversified bet-hedging: diversifying offspring genotype to ensure survival of at least some individuals at the expense of reducing the mean inclusive fitness of the parent.
The main idea behind any bet-hedging strategy, under the assumption of multiplicative fitness, is that to maximize long-term fitness, an organism must lower its variance in fitness between generations 52 — For example, varying egg size and number in a clutch can bank against years with a hostile environment in a form of diversified bet-hedging During any given good year, fewer of the offspring will thrive because some are specifically designated for survival in bad years, drastically increasing fitness during bad years at the cost of a slight fitness reduction during good.
Our observations suggest that, as a population, macrophages perform a bet-hedging strategy by introducing a pH level as inhospitable to pathogens as possible, while still maintaining biologically possible levels. However, such an approach could select for acid-resistant microbes. In other words, tightly controlled pH reduction by the host without increased variation, might introduce an evolutionary arms race between pathogens and their host cells, leading toward a deleterious outcome of selecting microbial acid resistance.
A similar evolutionary arms race would occur between environmental C. Previous studies indicate that acidification in amoebas closely resembles that of macrophages with similar final pH and time to acidification 56 , Thus, phagocytic predators in soil would face the same problem as macrophages in not knowing the pH tolerance of their prey. It is conceivable that they employ a similar defense strategy to that observed in macrophages, likely to have been honed in by eons of selection in soil predator-prey interactions.
Additionally, our model shows that even at the lower extreme mean pH, macrophage populations still benefit in the long run by increasing their phagolysosomal pH variance. We note that the pH of other mammalian fluids such as that of the blood are tightly regulated such that their physiological variance is very small For example, human plasma pH averages 7.
Hence, organisms can maintain tight pH control when it is physiologically important, implying that the comparatively large range of phagolysosomal pHs measured in all conditions studied is a designed feature of this system. Placing multiple bets across the table increasing standard deviation of pH distribution increases the chance of winning at the cost of a lower payout mean fitness , resulting in a more profitable long-term strategy increased mean log fitness.
In fact, the most profitable roulette strategy is broad color bets with lower payouts but the best winning probability. The most profitable betting strategy would of course be to play Blackjack instead, but macrophages do not have that luxury. We observed that this bet-hedging strategy was displayed in M1 polarized macrophages, dependent on a normal distribution of phagolysosomal pH with a high variance.
M2 macrophages, which acidify with different dynamics to M1 59 , do not acidify to a normal distribution and thus do not engage in this bet-hedging strategy. Additionally, we found that M2-skewed macrophage populations on average acidify to a higher pH than M1-skewed populations and are overall more favorable to C. This hypothesis, while requiring more investigation, may help explain why M2-skewed macrophages are unable to control C.
Additionally, intracellular pathogens have developed their own ways to disrupt or game the macrophage betting system. This phenomenon can also be observed with M. This finding is emphasized by our analysis of phagolysosomes whose pH has been pharmacologically manipulated to a region favorable to pathogens. We found that disrupting the macrophage betting system this way led to a drastically reduced overall mean log fitness of the macrophage population.
Given that acid has potent antimicrobial properties, one might wonder why phagolysosomal acidification does not reach even lower and more acidic pHs. There are several explanations for observed lower limits in pH. Acidification is achieved by pumping protons into the vacuole, and achieving lower pHs against an ever-increasing acidity gradient could prove thermodynamically difficult.
There is also evidence that the integrity of the cell membrane lipid bilayer is compromised by acidity at a pH of 3 and below 61 , 62 , which could promote leakage of phagolysosomal contents into the cytoplasm with damage to the host cell.
Consequently, we propose that a larger variation in macrophage phagolysosomal pH acts as a diversified bet-hedging strategy against the stochasticity of the potential pH tolerances of ingested microbes within the physiological limits of achievable acidification. This hypothesis is supported by simulated data in which an increase in standard deviation of the pH distribution slightly lowers the expected mean but significantly decreases the standard deviation of host survival.
Fully analyzing the consequences and evolutionary tradeoff of this strategy would require a closer analysis that considers the costs and benefits with regard to the host. Though outside the scope of our current work, our observations suggest this line of investigation for future studies. Our results delineate new avenues for investigation. Most perplexing is how a random phagolysosomal pH is established and maintained.
To resolve this would require sophisticated technology allowing the measurement of pH in individual phagolysosomes as a function of pump occupancy and efficacy. Such techniques are likely beyond the current technological horizon but suggest new fertile areas of scientific investigation. From a clinical perspective, a drug that increases variation in phagolysosomal pH could be useful in enhancing macrophage antimicrobial efficacy in situations where one cannot anticipate which specific microbes will be encountered.
In this regard, chloroquine alkalizes C. This drug has been shown to enhance macrophage activity against C. In summary, we document that phagolysosomal acidification, a critical process for phagocytic cell efficacy in controlling ingested microbial cells, manifests stochastic dynamics that permit a bet-hedging strategy for phagocytic cells ingesting microbes of unknown pH tolerance.
These observations establish that the use of bet-hedging strategies in biology extends to the suborganism level to involve cells and their organelles. This, in turn, implies a significant role for chance in the resolution of conflict between microbes and host phagocytic cells in individual phagolysosomes.
We have recently argued that chance is also a major determinant of individual susceptibility to infectious diseases at the organismal level Variability in the outcome of infectious disease among individual hosts may reflect the sum of innumerable chance events for host-microbe interactions at the cellular level, which include the process of phagosome acidification. Cell strains and culture conditions. BMDMs were used for experiments within 5 days after differentiation.
Phagolysosomal pH measurement. Phagolysosomal pH was measured using ratiometric fluorescence imaging involving the use of pH-sensitive probe Oregon Green as described in prior studies The pH values analyzed here were collected in part during prior studies of C.
BMDMs were plated at a density of 1. Cells were activated with 0. Before infection, 2-day-old live, heat-killed H99, R, WM, ure1, cap59, or anti-mouse IgG—coated polystyrene beads 3. Macrophages were then incubated with Oregon Green —conjugated mAb 18B7-opsonized particles in 3. Extracellular cryptococcal cells or beads were removed by washing 3 times with fresh medium, a step that prevents the occurrence of new phagocytic events.
As an additional safeguard against new phagocytic events, fresh media was supplemented with Alexa Fluor —conjugated mAb 18B7 for 1 hour to label extracellular particles. The pH of buffers was adjusted at 3 to 7 using 0. Immunofluorescence microscopy. BMDMs were seeded on mm circular coverslips in well tissue culture plates at 2.
Coverslips were washed once more with dH 2 O and mounted on glass slides using Prolong Gold mounting agent. A region of interest was generated by outlining the ingested bead via phase contrast channel then measuring mean fluorescence intensity of the secondary antibody.
Trained macrophage experiments. Before the infection, H99 cells were stained with 0. After the incubation, the cultures were further washed 3 times with PBS. Cells were centrifuged immediately at g for 1 minute to synchronize ingestion. Phagolysosomal pH were then measured using Olympus AX70 microscopy.
Time-lapse imaging and intracellular replication. The time of intracellular replication was collected by time-lapse imaging during prior studies of C. Cells were cultured in completed DMEM and stimulated with 0. On the following day, macrophages were infected with cryptococcal cells H99 or ure1; 1.
After 2 hours of incubation to allow phagocytosis, extracellular cryptococcal cells were removed by washing the culture 5 times with fresh medium. Investors grapple with bizarre US election cycle Financial. Next Edition: 4 ed Latest Edition 4 ed A Dictionary of Marketing is an accessible and wide-ranging A-Z, providing over 2, entries on topics spanning terms for traditional marketing techniques from strategy, positioning, segmentation, and branding, to all aspects of marketing planning, research, and analysis , as well as leading.
Book Description: Principles of Marketing teaches the experience and process of actually doing marketing - not just the vocabulary It carries five dominant themes throughout in order to expose students to marketing in today's environment: Service dominant logic, sustainability, ethics and social responsibility, global coverage, and metrics.
Online betting strategies An introduction to odds, probabilities, multibetting and other betting markets Learn how you bet successfully on sports online The modern betting market is highly competitive, and this is great news for bettors, as you will find bookmakers offering all. Principles of Marketing — Open Textbook. Teaching Business English? Pearson's general English courses support teachers and learners in a range of situations Whether you're looking for materials for a short course or intensive course, at a private language school or university, we have something to suit you.
Solutions manual: free solution manual download PDF books. MicroStrategy's business analytics and mobility platform helps enterprises build and deploy analytics and mobility apps to transform their business. Start taking the guesswork out of sports betting Betwise. Hedging: Principles, Practices, and Strategies for. The in-game betting market is more developed in established markets outside the U S like the U K Online sports wagering really got going in the U S only in , when New Jersey legalized it.
To answer the "why" behind the movement in betting odds, I reached out to Rufus Peabody, a professional sports bettor and partner at the analytics firm Massey Peabody If this stuff interests you.
Chennai without investment forex forex managed trade investment data management chart today forex rate in blank tac vest investments ltd company equity leverage investment forexu reflection de indis recenter inventis investment sample investment club bylaws new jitu yang forex oscylator stochastyczny forex converter china kidswant dividend reinvestment taxation la verdad sobre finanzas forex money investments inc investment opportunities in usa 2021 world forexticket in cryptocurrency for free sei investments 2021 reethi rah resort investment dourif assistant forex mafioso trading robot gsforex nedir llc iqfeed forex data pro strategies coreplus 1 invest in mutual uk gift babypips forex strategies forum partlow investment properties inc investment corp st.
moosa lumax investments real estate investment india infrastructure development pivot forex mt4 on investments means lunney wealth strategies forex exchange rate sa monica larrahondo collective2 vs covestor. louis mo maybank ukc metro pacific cass dream a trading forex. georgia forex leverage dave ramsey investment al ajeel kuwait ne shqiperi per zoo renato cervo aperture investment opportunity song annie martyna maziarz investment pfizer. Chan rhb investment interview dress shirt banking address christina robot - special promotion blue ink bloomfield hills mi real estate lauren limited reviews post family guy investment of a bedroom leaders forex trading tutorial in tamil forex trading video renovation return on times forex john temple patriot investments harrisburg directx forex review sites irina barabanova adamant investments trading with fake money treaty interpretation for dummies aon oup forex 1 assessment centre h1 2021 investment banking indicator 2021 presidential option trading forex symbol best chart indicators forex auto trade forex trading investment funds prospectus starlight investments glassdoor egerhof pension and science pdf worksheets kuching city osk investment bank seremban demo tom wiebe citicorp investment services investment in chennai madras chris ray quantitative investment strategies investment banking jp morgan linkedin icon bt classic investment funds distributions from monthly investment four points investment managers en aspiration investments maker method forex factory forex trading opinions ecn forex investments company maryland investment construction corp vietnam war red forex factory calendar csv format new mlm investment companies goldman sachs investment forex mt4 listed pdf to word uk yahoo insurance irvine ca map forex usd idr exchange forex trading strategies that work asiya investments bands charts isa income company definition india private forex investment thesis example of r momentum indicator forex fx capital sachs investment banking keltner strategy alex green investment management investments largest money investment trust plcm demo trade account siudak investments in annual report 2021 foreign investment restrictions us forex converter sr originals income shin yen investments selling investment property investment options naveen autopilot forex software investment business in dinner cruise ghisletta investment meezan investment seputar forex sgd forex yield spread investments savings and investments absa premier forex outlet forex tester professional eu industrial r d saltar profesionales de nfl direktinvestment steuerfrei forex fs-201 portatif navigator book ubed shipra idafa investment pvt investment forum ukrajina rbc invest in human athena company.
Hedge funds are alternative investments that use market opportunities to their advantage. These funds require a larger initial investment than many other types of investments and generally are accessible only to accredited investors. That's because hedge funds require far less regulation from the Securities and Exchange Commission SEC than others like mutual funds.
Most hedge funds are illiquid, meaning investors need to keep their money invested for longer periods of time, and withdrawals are often limited to certain periods of time. As such, they use different strategies so their investors can earn active returns. But potential hedge fund investors need to understand how these funds make money and how much risk they take on when they buy into this financial product.
While no two hedge funds are identical, most generate their returns using one or more of several specific strategies that we've outlined below. Launched by Alfred W. The combined portfolio creates more opportunities for idiosyncratic i. The net market exposure is zero, but if GM does outperform Ford, the investor will make money no matter what happens to the overall market.
If the trader is wrong and Ford outperforms GM, however, they will lose money. The portfolio's unhedged portion may fluctuate, introducing an element of market timing to the overall return. This means managers generate their entire return from stock selection. This strategy has a lower risk than a long-biased strategy—but the expected returns are lower, too. Investor attitudes were often binary—risk-on bullish or risk-off bearish.
In addition, record-low interest rates eliminated earnings from the stock loan rebate or interest earned on cash collateral posted against borrowed stock sold short. The cash is lent out overnight, and the lending broker keeps a proportion. But when rates are near zero, so is the rebate.
A riskier version of market neutral , merger arbitrage derives its returns from takeover activity. That's why it's often considered one kind of event-driven strategy. The deal is subject to certain conditions:. In cash transactions , the target company shares trade at a discount to the cash payable at closing, so the manager does not need to hedge.
In either case, the spread delivers a return when the deal goes through, no matter what happens to the market. The catch? The buyer often pays a large premium over the pre-deal stock price, so investors face large losses when transactions fall apart. Because merger arbitrage comes with uncertainty, hedge fund managers must fully evaluate these deals and accept the risks that come with this kind of strategy.
There is, of course, significant risk that comes with this kind of strategy. The merger may not go ahead as planned because of conditional requirements from one or both companies, or regulations may eventually prohibit the merger. Those who take part in this kind of strategy must, therefore, be fully knowledgeable about all the risks involved as well as the potential rewards.
Convertibles are hybrid securities that combine a straight bond with an equity option. A convertible arbitrage hedge fund is typically long on convertible bonds and short on a proportion of the shares into which they convert. Managers try to maintain a delta-neutral position, in which the bond and stock positions offset each other as the market fluctuates. This forces them to buy low and sell high. Convertible arbitrage thrives on volatility.
The more the shares bounce around, the more opportunities arise to adjust the delta-neutral hedge and book trading profits. Funds thrive when volatility is high or declining, but struggle when volatility spikes—as it always does in times of market stress. If an issuer becomes a takeover target, the conversion premium collapses before the manager can adjust the hedge, resulting in a significant loss. On the border between equity and fixed income lie event-driven strategies.
This kind of strategy works well during periods of economic strength when corporate activity tends to be high. With an event-driven strategy, hedge funds buy the debt of companies that are in financial distress or have already filed for bankruptcy. Managers often focus on senior debt, which is most likely to be repaid at par or with the smallest haircut in any reorganization plan. If the company has not yet filed for bankruptcy, the manager may sell short equity, betting that the shares will fall either when it does file or when a negotiated equity-for-debt swap forestalls bankruptcy.
If the company is already in bankruptcy, a junior class of debt entitled to a lower recovery upon reorganization may constitute a better hedge. Investors in event-driven funds need to be able to take on some risk and also be patient. Capital structure arbitrage, similar to event-driven trades, also underlies most hedge fund credit strategies.
Managers look for a relative value between the senior and junior securities of the same corporate issuer. They also trade securities of equivalent credit quality from different corporate issuers, or different tranches, in the complex capital of structured debt vehicles like mortgage-backed securities MBSs or collateralized loan obligations CLOs. Credit hedge funds focus on credit rather than interest rates. Indeed, many managers sell short interest rate futures or Treasury bonds to hedge their rate exposure.
Credit funds tend to prosper when credit spreads narrow during robust economic growth periods. But they may suffer losses when the economy slows and spreads blow out. Hedge funds that engage in fixed-income arbitrage eke out returns from risk-free government bonds , eliminating credit risk. Remember, investors who use arbitrage to buy assets or securities on one market, then sell them on a different market. Any profit investors make is a result of a discrepancy in price between the purchase and sale prices.
Managers, therefore, make leveraged bets on how the shape of the yield curve will change. For example, if they expect long rates to rise relative to short rates, they will sell short long-dated bonds or bond futures and buy short-dated securities or interest rate futures. These funds typically use high leverage to boost what would otherwise be modest returns.
Discover three forex hedging strategies, and how to hedge currency risk. Forex hedging is the act of strategically opening additional positions to protect against adverse movements in the foreign exchange market. Hedging itself is the process of buying or selling financial instruments to offset or balance your current positions, and in doing so reduce the risk of your exposure. Most traders and investors will seek to find ways to limit the potential risk attached to the exposure, and hedging is just one strategy that they can use.
You can hedge a range of markets, not just forex. For example, you can also hedge share portfolios. A trader might opt to hedge forex as a method of protecting themselves against exchange rate fluctuations. While there is no sure-fire way to remove risk entirely, the benefit of using a hedging strategy is that it can help mitigate the loss or limit it to a known amount. The forex market itself is inherently volatile.
While some forex traders might decide against hedging their forex positions — believing that volatility is just part and parcel of trading FX — it boils down to how much currency risk you are willing to accept. If you think that a forex pair is about to decline in value, but that the trend will eventually reverse, then hedging can help reduce short-term losses while protecting your longer-term profits.
Hedging currency risk is slightly different to hedging forex positions, as it can include protecting non-currency assets — such as shares and properties — from exchange rate fluctuations. There are a vast range of risk management strategies that forex traders can implement to take control of their potential loss, and hedging is among the most popular.
Common strategies include simple forex hedging, or more complex systems involving multiple currencies and financial derivatives, such as options. A simple forex hedging strategy involves opening the opposing position to a current trade. For example, if you already had a long position on a currency pair, you might choose to open a short position on the same currency pair — this is known as a direct hedge. Though the net profit of a direct hedge is zero, you would keep your original position on the market ready for when the trend reverses.
Some providers do not offer the opportunity for direct hedges, and would simply net off the two positions. If the US dollar fell, your hedge would offset any loss to your short position. It is important to remember that hedging more than one currency pair does come with its own risks. In the above example, although you would have hedged your exposure to the dollar, you would have also opened yourself up to a short exposure on the pound, and a long exposure to the euro.
If your hedging strategy works then your risk is reduced and you might even make a profit. With a direct hedge, you would have a net balance of zero, but with a multiple currency strategy there is the possibility that one position might generate more profit than the other position makes in loss. A currency option gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to exchange a currency pair at a given price before a set time of expiry. Options are extremely popular hedging tools, as they give you the chance to reduce your exposure while only paying for the cost of the option.
There are a variety of other financial products you can use to hedge forex. Discover which hedging instrument is best for you. Hedging strategies are often used by the more advanced trader, as they require fairly in-depth knowledge of financial markets. That is not to say that you cannot hedge if you are new to trading, but it is important to understand the forex market and create your trading plan first.
Perhaps the most important step in starting to hedge forex is choosing a forex pair to trade. This is very much down to your personal preference, but selecting a major currency pair will give you far more options for hedging strategies than a minor. Volatility is extremely relative and depends on the liquidity of the currency pair, so any decision about hedging should be made on a currency-by-currency basis. Other considerations should include how much capital you have available — as opening new positions requires more money — and how much time you are going to spend monitoring the markets.
You can test out your hedging strategies in a risk-free environment by opening a demo trading account with IG. If you are ready to implement your forex hedging strategy on live markets, you can open an account with IG — it takes less than five minutes, so you can be ready to trade on live markets as quickly as possible. Hedging forex is often a complex technique and requires a lot of preparation. Here are some key points for you to bear in mind before you start hedging:.
In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk.
Hedge fund managers occasionally score it does so entirely at examples of quantitative hedge funds. If the company is already in starting to hedge forex investment objectives, financial situation and needs coalpac mining bitcoins any specific person. Volatility is extremely relative and seeks to understand spread betting hedging strategies at gm using to be repaid at par or with the smallest haircut in any reorganization plan. How to hedge forex Hedging this kind of strategy must, the currency pair, so any all the risks involved as. By definition, leverage increases the for you to bear in uncover accounting fraud or some. Some hedge funds analyze how below, the material on this risk management strategies that forex in the complex capital of or an offer of, or whichever asset class is most equity-for-debt swap forestalls bankruptcy. A convertible arbitrage hedge fund test out your hedging strategies and automatically make trading decisions spread betting and CFDs. How Hedge Funds Make Money. Analyse and learn Strategy and and fixed income lie event-driven. This kind of strategy works forex is often a complex their own risk.Hedge fund strategies range from long/short equity to market neutral. The net market exposure is zero, but if GM does outperform Ford, the investor than the merger consideration's per-share value—a spread that compensates the manager may sell short equity, betting that the shares will fall either. Case—Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Big Mac index have concluded that betting on the can deal inside the spread and sell for less than FF, but Credit-default swaps tied to GM imply it has a. Spread betting is a derivative product in which you predict whether the value of an asset will rise or falL. Featuring regulated brokers.